AG Kaphale winds up cross-examining of first petitioner SKC

Written by  MBC Online

Attorney General Kalekeni Kaphale, representing the Malawi Electoral Commission (MEC) on Wednesday concluded four days of his cross-examination of first petitioner Saulos Chilima of UTM, summarizing key questions he asked Chilima. 

Cross-examination is over for SKC. Cross-examination is over for SKC.
14
August

MBC Online presents some of the highlights:


AG: We haven’t come across where the valid votes of any candidate were altered?


SKC: When we speak about valid votes only, yes.


AG: Would you agree with me that you have not come across any alteration of votes in the 198 centres you allege?


SKC: Yes.


AG: Between the three of you [main contenders Mutharika, Chakwera and Chilima]you shared 4.74 million votes?


SKC: That is correct.

 

AG: Between number 1 and 2, do you know the difference in votes?


SKC: 158,000.


AG: its obvious votes from 198 wouldn’t affect results?

 

SKC: Yes, it wouldn’t affect.


AG: Would you have come to court if there no results to challenge?

 

SKC: No.

 

AG: At St. Thomas commercial school polling centre,  you didn’t find your name, but you voted?

 

SKC: Yes, I voted.

 

AG: This kind of problem [where your name missed] happened to you only?

 

SKC: That’s correct.

 

AG: You wrote to MEC for MEC Chairperson Ansah to resign?

 

SKC: That’s correct.

 

AG: MEC makes majority decisions and you did not challenge her [Ansah] through an affidavit for making her own decision?

 

SKC: Not on that matter.

 

AG: The national result was an aggregation of streams and polling stations. It was possible for you to select bad polling results?

 

SKC: Ideally, yea.

 

AG: For the whole country, no [UTM] monitor is challenging the results and you don’t have alternative results?

 

SKC: That’s correct.

 

The AG is likely to call several UTM officials to be cross-examined when hearinmg resumes on Friday. 

Get Your Newsletter