Attorney General Kalekeni Kaphale, in continuing to examine Chilima on the third day, asked the UTM leader: Do you have alternative results?

Chilima: No, I don’t.

He also answered that no UTM monitor challenged the results through sworn statements after signing.

Kaphale: Was the valid vote count not altered?

Chilima: That is correct.

Kaphale: If you had alternative results, would you have brought them to court?

Chilima: Yes, we would have.

Kaphale: Was Tippex used to cheat on valid forms?

Chilima: I can’t say, but they should not have used any Tippex at all.

Kaphale: Was Tippex used to commit fraud?

Chilima: They shouldn’t have used Tippex at all.

Kaphale: Has any monitor denied any signature used on results sheets?

Chilima: Not to my knowledge.

Kaphale: All you are questioning is the use of duplicates. Seeing your monitors sign on these duplicate forms, did you ask them what they were signing for?

Chilima: No, I didn’t.

Kapahale: What kind of results did you tell your monitors to sign for, correct or fake results?

Chilima: Only correct results.

Kaphale: At the tally centre, did you tell your monitors to sign for correct results?

Chilima: That is true.

Kaphale: None of your monitors challenged the signed results?

Chilima: Yes.

Kaphale: Despite signing on duplicates, your monitors were unable to challenge the correctness of the results?

Chilima: That is true, in the absence of original copies.

Kaphale: Do any of your monitors say the duplicate was fake document?

Chilima: For these forms, certainly not to my knowledge.Kaphale: Only one monitor is challenging his signature?

Chilima: That is true.

Kaphale: He doesn’t challenge at the tally centre?

Chilima: That is correct.

Kaphake: Did you your monitors why they signed on duplicate forms?

Chilima: No, I didn’t ask them.

Kaphale: Did they protest results signed on duplicates?

Chlilima: That is not to my knowledge.

Kaphale: Between June and now, no monitor has given you alternative results?

Chilima: Yes, I can confirm.

Kaphale: If they had them, you would have brought them to court?

Chilima: That is correct, after comparison with originals.

Hearing continues Wednesday and Kaphale has indicated that he might finish cross-examining Chilima by the end of day Wednesday before starting cross-examining a new witness.

Chilima's tesmony willmake or break the case.

MCP leader Lazarus Chakwera, who is the second petitioner, is also expected to appear in the witness box.